ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and diagnostic reliability of conoctional parietal pleural biopsy to a technique of visceral pleural biopsy. METHOD: Study comprises of 54 diagnosed cases of pleural effusion and after establishing the clinical diagnosis for probable etiological causes. Then parietal pleural biopsy using absents punch biopsy needle and vesceral pleural biopsy using Prabhudesai et al technique was taken in all these patients. Size of the tissue yield; percentage of biopsies; diagnostic yield and sensitivity for these two techniques were compared. RESULTS: A definitive etiological diagnosis could be reached in 52 out of 54 patients on the basis of pleural biopsy (33 tuberculous, 16 malignant and 3 pyogenic), 23 (69.7%) tuberculous effusion patients were diagnosis by visceral pleural biopsy and 14 (42.4%) by parietal pleural biopsy out of 33 diagnosed tuberculous effusion cases. While for the 16 malignant effusions the visceral pleural biopsy showed suggestive histological change in 13 (81.25%) patients and the parietal pleural biopsy in seven (43.8%) with five (31.25%) of these patients being positive by both. All three pyogenic effusions showed only nonspecific inflammatory change in both pleurae. CONCLUSION: The mean size of biopsy sample obtained with modified Prabhudesai et al technique was significantly larger than that of the parietal pleural biopsy with Abrams punch (4.85 mm2 V/s 2.5 mm2 with P < 0.01). Adequate pleural tissue was identifiable in 94.4% and 90.7% of cases, respectively. The modified Prabhudesai et al technique proved to be effective safe and easily learnt. Visceral pleural sampling using this technique is a definite superior addition to the present diagnostic armamentarium of an idiopathic pleural effusion and its routine application together with parietal pleural biopsy will help to establish a definitive diagnosis in majority of patients with idiopathic pleural effusions.